***Cracks in House as Minority Caucus, Reps spokesman clash
***Ezekwesili: Buhari has shown where he stands on terrorism
****JNI: Linking minister to Yakowa’s death false, disgusting
***PDP to Buhari: Send minister to deradicalization centre
***Pantami’s case different from Adeosun’s – Garba Shahu
Many Nigerians are displeased with the Presidency for expressing support for Communications and Digital Economy Minister Isa Pantami over his alleged sympathy for terror groups.
Some of them took to the social media yesterday to denounce the federal government for backing Pantami who has come under pressure to resign on account of his past sermons.
The opposition Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) said the embattled minister belongs to the deradicalization centre and not the Federal Executive Council. It asked President Muhammadu Buhari to fire him.
Leading Islamic body in the north, Jama’atu Nasril Islam (JNI), dismissed as false and disgusting an allegation linking it and Pantami to the death of a former governor of Kaduna State, Mr. Patrick Yakowa.
A social media report had claimed that the minister presided over a JNI meeting where the decision to kill Yakowa was taken.
President Buhari’s Special Adviser on Media and Publicity, Mallam Garba Shehu, had said on Thursday that the administration stood by Pantami, having “rightly apologised for what he said in the early 2000s.”
He said: “The views were absolutely unacceptable then, and would be equally unacceptable today, were he to repeat them.”
According to Garba Shehu, critics “do not really care what he may or may not have said some 20 years ago: that is merely the instrument they are using to attempt to ‘cancel’ him.”
Reacting yesterday on Twitter to the Presidency’s position, former Minister of Education, Oby Ezekwesili, said she did not agree with government that “any citizen can get away with such bloodcurdling rhetoric the latter made through the years.”
She added: “Worse, that one who swore an oath to public office said and did the things @NigeriaGov has waved off.
“Yesterday’s action by our President was an anti-climax. He has persisted in badly managing our country’s diversity.
“Nigeria cannot at this stage avoid a genuine conversation about its future. The signs are all too obvious for all to see and act on.
“In that singular act of siding with his Minister of Communication, @NGRPresident @MBuhari actually conveyed a message on his view of terrorism. Nigerians now know that his views align with that of his minister. It is now left to Nigerians to convey whether we agree with them.”
Some other critics wondered why government did not treat the #ENDSARS protesters, many of whom were teenagers, the same way it is now treating Pantami for the views he reportedly made when he was also a teenager.
They cited the case of #EndSARS promoter Bolatito Oduala who was a victim of government’s clampdown after the protests.
Some others said the government left former Finance Minister Kemi Adeosun to her fate following a report that she forged her National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) discharge certificate.
Adeosun resigned her appointment on September 14, 2018.
#OurFavOnlineDoc @DrOlufunmilayo said: “The Nigerian govt had a very rare opportunity yesterday- while the whole world watched- to declare where we stand on terrorism. The Nigerian govt was very loud and clear we are a country that fully endorses terrorism. And this, my friends, is how we market Nigeria to the world.
“When (former Chief Justice of Nigeria, Walter) Onnoghen was removed, it was not cancel culture. When Kemi Adeosun was kicked out, it was not cancel culture. But on Isa Pantami, a man who openly supported terrorists, admired Osama Bin Laden and praised Al-Qaeda, it is cancel culture to ask for his resignation. We are finished.”
Concerned Nigerians@ConcernedNIG said: “Even if Pantami likes, let him make the cost of data free. He must go. A terrorist sympathiser is no different from a terrorist. #PantamiMustGo.”
NEFERTITI @firstladyship said: “Pantami was 30yrs (an adult) when he made those incendiary remarks. It not only led to the death of Sunday Achi, it sparked the killing of Christians in Jos, Kaduna & most of the North. Your attempt at gaslighting is dead on arrival.
PDP: Pantami must go, he belongs to de-radicalization centre
The opposition Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) asked the President to immediately withdraw the statement supporting Pantami, relieve him of his position as minister and “take a bold step to flush out terrorist apologists from the Presidency.”
Its spokesman, Kola Ologbondiyan, said in a statement in Abuja yesterday that Pantami “belongs to the de-radicalization centre and not in any way in the Federal Executive Council.”
It said the Presidency statement “confirms public and international apprehensions that the Buhari administration and the APC are patronising acts of terrorism in our country.”
Continuing, the PDP said: “Nigerians were traumatised that the Presidency could mount a hopeless defence and justification for the actions of the exposed Minister of Communications and Digital Economy, Dr. Isa Pantami, who had already confessed to supporting terrorist groups like al-Qaeda and Taliban.
“Our party holds that this has further exposed why the Buhari Presidency has failed to decisively confront terrorism as well as why terrorists, bandits, kidnappers and insurgents are emboldened to ravage our nation and massacre our compatriots.
“It is inexcusable that the Buhari Presidency is showing grave insensitivity to the fact that thousands of Nigerians have been massacred, maimed and horrified; that hundreds of communities have been devastated and that our nation has been under siege because of the actions and public comments by individuals like Dr. Isa Pantami.
“Our party notes that if indeed, the Buhari Presidency has not found itself entangled, the least it ought to have done in the face of allegations against Dr. Isa Pantami was to reassure Nigerians by first relieving Isa Pantami of his office and hand him over to the appropriate agency for deradicalization.”
Galadima to Presidency: Release Nyame, Dariye from jail
National Secretary of the defunct Congress for Progressive Change (CPC), Alhaji Buba Galadima, also faulted the Presidency on its support for Pantami.
He said on Arise Television that if all it takes for government to forgive offenders is an apology, then it should set free from jail Joshua Dariye and Jolly Nyam, ex-governors of Plateau and Taraba states respectively, having shown remorse for the offence of corruption that got them convicted.
His words: “This issue is not a question of religion, because I don’t believe Isa Pantami is a representative of Islam. It is an issue that negates the laws of our country.
“We can’t pick and choose. If anybody commits any offence, irrespective of his position, tribe, or religion, the law must take its course. This is a moral burden on the shoulders of this government.
“We shouldn’t choose and pick, because if anybody who commits an offence apologises and should be let free, then let the federal government should release Jolly Nyame, Dariye of Plateau state; they have been jailed and they had remorse in court. Or those that are being interrogated for theft should be left off the hook if they apologise.
“Pantami has already admitted his crime, so there is no need to investigate anything. He has already admitted and apologised. Whether the apology is good enough to exonerate him, that I wouldn’t know. It is opportunism by these clergymen all over, on both sides, that they play to the gallery because they want to draw attention.
“Now, he did that in a certain period and now he is reaping the fruits because he has been recognised and given an appointment. Now that his past was bad, it is important that he faces his own music.”
House of Reps leadership disagrees over Pantami’s fate
The Pantami issue also seems to be generating bad blood between the Minority Caucus in the House of Representatives and the House leadership following a failed attempt by the caucus to push through a motion demanding the suspension or sack of the minister.
Spokesman of the caucus, Francis Ottah Agbo, accused the Chairman of the House Committee on Media and Public Affairs/ Spokesman of the House, Hon. Benjamin Kalu, of misleading the Nigerian public on “genuine effort in the fight against terrorism in our country.”
Agbo was responding to a statement by Kalu that the motion presented on the Pantami issue by the Minority leader, Ndidi Elumelu, was not properly presented.
Kalu had said Elumelu should have known better than to present such an issue for debate via Order 6 of the House Rules which only applies to Legislative Privileges.
However, Agbo said yesterday that Kalu’s comments “clearly exposed a sinister intention to misrepresent the rules of the House, mislead the undiscerning public and frustrate genuine effort in the fight against terrorism in our country.”
He said: “We find it shocking that instead of standing with Nigerians at this critical moment, Hon. Kalu chose to engage in personal attack on the Minority Leader, Hon Ndudi Elumelu, for pointing to the dangers of retaining in office the Minister of Communications and Digital Economy, Isa Pantami, after reports of the minister’s support for terrorists came to the fore.
“This is especially after the minister himself admitted to the facts of his sympathy for violent, extremist and terrorist groups, including, the al-Qaida and Taliban.
“Indeed, Hon. Kalu’s claim that our Minority Leader did not properly present his motion under an appropriate rule is frivolous and exposes his poor knowledge of the legislative procedures. It also points to a deliberate scheme to jeopardise our nation’s fight against terrorism.
“Furthermore, we take a strong exception to Hon. Kalu’s vain posturing of trying to tutor the Minority Leader, a well-respected seasoned legislator, on the House Standing Rules and parliamentary convention.
“It is instructive to state that the motion by the Minority Leader calling for the resignation or sack of the Minister by President Muhammadu Buhari was properly presented under the House rules as provided in Order 6: 1,2&3 (Privileges), contrary to claims by Hon. Kalu.
“Order 6:1,2,3 clearly and generously provide for full debate on the issue brought pursuant to it. For the avoidance of doubt, while sub-section 2 of the Order 6 provides that ‘whenever a matter of privilege arises, it shall be taken into consideration immediately’, sub section 3 is clear in providing that whenever a matter of privilege arises, it shall be disposed of and no other issue shall be considered until ‘the debate on a motion thereon” is adjourned…”
House will never support terrorist or sponsors of terrorism- Reps Spokesman
In a swift reaction to the Minority Caucus statement last night, Kalu said the House of Representatives would never support any act of terrorism or sponsors of terrorism in any form.
He said all insinuations that the House failed to subject the issue of Pantami to democratic debate were false.
Kalu said the House would always stand with Nigerians while following proper procedures.
Kalu said the issue raised by the House Minority Leader borders on issues of national importance which should have been brought to the attention of the House through a motion of urgent national importance.
He said: “The House acknowledges the severity of the issue and its nature as a matter of public concern. As always, the House stands ready to give audience to Rep. Ndudi Elumelu or any other member of the House on this issue, provided that such audience is sought through the proper channels and brought under the relevant rules of the House.”
He said the House stands by its earlier positions “as they are in line with the House rules we made to guide us and should not be seen breaching it as every good law applies to both principal officers and first-time members in the spirit of equality before the law.
”The relevant issue raised by Hon Elumelu which is of national importance is inadmissible under privileges for what it seeks to address, since matters under privilege, once breached, must be personal and internal to the House.
“This is why all matters of privilege are sent to the House Committee on Ethics and Privileges, not to the President directly as the house resolution as alleged by the yet to be tutored “spokesman” of the minority caucus.
“One wonders what the house committee on ethics and privilege will be doing with the sack of Pantami. “That there is no debate on privileges unless a motion has arisen from it, in which case it must be seconded before debated in line with the house rules and procedure to a motion.
“Hon Ndudi Elumelu, though seasoned, experienced and celebrated legislator unlike his spokesman Hon Francis Agbo, came under the wrong order on this issue and the presiding officer, the Rt. Hon. Speaker Femi Gbajabiamila, brought it to his notice openly on the floor of the house and in front of the camera watched and heard all over the world.
“The right parliamentary corridor to pass important issues like this, which had a national out-look, not specific on a particular member of the House to the exclusion of all others and urgent, should have been either through a Motion on Matter of Public Importance or a Motion on Notice, since it concerns the entire nation.
“Bringing it up under any of the two motions will give the debate a democratic spread among members from different constituencies to be well heard
JNI: Linking us, Pantami to Yakowa’s death’s disgusting
Also yesterday, the apex Islamic body in the north, Jama’atu Nasril Islam (JNI), described as false and disgusting an allegation linking it and Dr. Isa Pantami to the death of ex-governor of Kaduna State, Patrick Yakowa.Yakowa was killed in a helicopter crash in Bayelsa State on December 15, 2012.A social media report earlier this week claimed that the embattled minister chaired a JNI meeting where the decision to kill him was taken.
Secretary-General of JNI, Dr. Khalid Abubakar Aliyu, said the allegation was designed to tarnish the organisation’s image, the Minister’s and those of other Islamic organisations.
He asked security agencies to immediately investigate the allegation and fish out those behind it.
He said: “To start with, how could Sheikh Pantami chair a JNI meeting while he was not one of its leaders either at the National or state levels?
“What could have necessitated the combination of Bauchi, Plateau, Niger and Kaduna states from different geo-political zones in the meeting?
“If Yakowa was vehemently hated by the Muslims and were desperately trying to ‘get rid’ of him, how did he win the 2011 elections in a Muslim dominated state of Kaduna where a Muslim-Muslim ticket recently sailed through? Who voted him in?
“The so-called pieces of minutes shared by the media to further confuse and manipulate an average Nigerian’s mind into believing this orchestrated lie has further confirmed the desperation of the perpetrators.
“It is very perplexing and heart-rending that minutes of an assassination plot could be written and kept. How disheartening and disgusting!
“We thought the plot against Sheikh Pantami is politically motivated, but surprisingly it is assuming to be a more sinister dimension born out of a well thought-out scheme designed to smear and tarnish the image and the good name of the JNI and other Muslim organisations.
“Considering the various concerns raised by many citizens, vis’-a’- vis the attendant consequence of the scandalous allegation, we wish to place on record and for posterity that such never occurred and the JNI does not operate in such a dubious manner. We are at loss as to why is this allegation coming up just now, many years after the demise of Mr Yakowa?”“This should be treated with utmost urgency and the JNI is ready to fully cooperate with the security agencies in this regard.”
John Joseph Hayab, chairman of the Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN) in Kaduna State, who served as religious affairs adviser to Yakowa, had also dismissed the allegations.
He said: “There is no point, now or later, to open up what will not bring back Yakowa but rather open up old wounds in a very controversial manner.”
Pantami’s case different from Adeosun’s — Presidency
Senior Special Assistant on Media and Publicity, Garba Shehu, argued that the alleged certificate forgery case of former Minister of Finance Kemi Adeosun cannot be compared with the alleged extremist views on terror groups expressed by Pantami.
Adeosun had resigned as minister in September 2018 after she was accused of forging her National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) exemption certificate.
Shehu spoke yesterday during an interview on Channels TV programme, Politics Today, monitored by The Nation.
The Nation learnt that part of the many arguments of Nigerians calling for Pantami’s resignation is hinged on the fact that Adeosun was haunted because of her past and she resigned.
But Shehu explained that the presidency’s response “would have been different” if Pantami had forged his certificate like Adeosun did.
The Presidency had defended the embattled Minister saying he made enemies because he tried to put Nigeria first and had initiated plans and policies that would profit the public.
“In the second case which is that of Pantami, you are probing the thoughts, what is called ‘McCarthyism’; you search the inner recesses of the minds of individuals, bring out things they have said, or they are about to say, or you think they would say, and use that against them,” he said.
