Protest at IMF, World Bank meeting over Nigeria’s borrowing
As the 2023 edition of the World Bank Group, WBG, Spring meetings draw to a close tomorrow in Washington DC, United States of America, USA, Nigeria’s participation for the first time ever, appears to have been colored with policy protest coming from the civil society groups.
On the sidelines of the meetings, Auwal Rafsanjani, the Executive Director of Civil Society Legislative Advocacy Centre, CSLAC, one of the groups from Africa at the meeting, told a select group of journalists that the representatives of civil society groups in Africa had a unique session with the Bretton Woods Instititions where the issues of accountability and governance in respect of debt was discussed.
According to him, they raised a concern with the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund, IMF, against Nigeria’s incessant borrowings from the two institutions especially the latest borrowing of $800 million.
He also said that the concern was at the backdrop of worsening economic situation of the country amidst continued borrowing which he said was plunging the country deeper into debt crises to be faced by generations of citizens that did not benefit from the loans.
He alleged that the funds borrowed were not used for the purpose rather they were taken up by corruption.
His words: ‘‘The Nigerian economy is really suffering from so many problems, from corruption, mismanagement, misplacement of priority, lack of compliance with our financial regulations and including what we may even see as deliberate efforts by public officials to undermine the revenue by creating leakages which further put the economy in jeopardy.
‘‘Nigeria continues to repay this money (loans) despite the deficit in our infrastructure, in other social sectors that suffer significantly, like almost the collapse of education, healthcare system, and other important aspects of governance like security.
‘‘Yet Nigerian government is borrowing money to finance subsidy. ‘‘Closely related to this development is the recent pronouncement by the government to borrow and spend over $800 million in the name of subsidy palliative.
‘‘This is another scam, because in 2020, during the COVID, Nigerian government approached IMF for a loan of $3.4 billion with a view to cushion the effects of COVID. But what we have seen was that the money was not judiciously utilized, and ordinary Nigerians that were promised palliatives did not see any palliative. ‘‘Infact, because of the official corruption, money were diverted by different agencies and parastatals in the name of palliatives.
‘‘We all remember how NNPC came to the National Assembly to testify about the billions they used in the name of COVID palliatives. We also remembered the ministry of Humanitarian Affairs Ministry, how they told the whole nation that, while children were at home, that they were doing school feeding program.
‘‘So this is how the money borrowed by Nigerian government and the contribution and donation by international partners and even Nigerian philanthropists disappeared without accountability.
‘‘So for you to now at the last minute of your regime, you are leaving next month, and you are borrowing $800 million to share without any clear accountability framework, it calls for alarm, worry and concern.
‘‘With the rising in inflation, increase in unemployment and increase in poverty, the country’s economy is becoming more and more worrisome. ‘‘This is why Civil Society Legislative Advocacy Center came along with other civil society organisations to the spring meeting taking place here in Washington DC to have discussion with the World Bank and IMF officials.
‘‘So yesterday we met with the directors of the IMF and World Bank, with a few select civil society groups from Africa, which I happen to be one of the groups, discussing about our concern on the way and manner in which our country quickly ran to come and borrow money even in deviation from the fiscal responsibility law which clearly states how government should borrow money.
‘‘But they borrow this money, they finance non economic projects. In many instances the so called constituency projects is also taking large chunk of the money they are borrowing to finance the budget.
‘‘So, we have come to discuss with them to express our worries and concern, that the non transparent spendings of money borrowed by our government is of a great concern to us, and that they must not continue to give these monies without putting accountability mechanism and also safe reporting for whistle blowers.
‘‘And if these monies are meant for the people of Nigeria, then they must involve non-state actors at least to observe and monitor how these monies are spent.
‘‘Now, Nigerian government continues to borrow money from all sorts of commercial banks. The worst part of it is that we are borrowing at the highest interest rate which is difficult to repay.
‘‘Even the conventional ones that they earlier want, we are finding it difficult to repay not to talk of those other commercial banks that their charges are very high; their interest rates are very high.
‘‘We are also concerned that there is no civic space to discuss economic management of Nigeria with non-state actors in Nigeria. For example, minister of finance is here, CBN governor is here, so many government agencies are here, but they are not able to have this kind of discussion with non-state actors that are also attending this meeting, unlike what we see with other countries.
‘‘For other countries, they sit together with their non-state actors like civil society organizations, to discuss on how to even approach the IMF and the World Bank.
‘‘But the arrogance of some few tiny public officials of Nigeria is closing the space for civil society to give valuable contribution to address the economic deterioration in Nigeria.
‘‘So that is why since we have a voice here, we have opportunity to interact with them (World Bank and IMF). They are the ones who are giving this loan, they are the ones who are also talking to the Nigerian government.
‘‘We are talking through them sadly, which is not supposed to be the case, we are supposed to be taking to our government but because our government has decided to close the civic space to enable civil society give concrete recommendation and suggestions on how to rebrand the economy.
‘‘So we also want the administration of Bola Tinubu to ensure that they strengthen our fiscal responsibility law, so that whenever we are borrowing, we are in compliance with the fiscal responsibility law. And those borrowing must not be just for consumption but it must actually be for productivity that will even pay back those loans’’. – Culled from Vanguard Online.
